| Title |
Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0333-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Gilbody, David Richards, Stephen Brealey, Catherine Hewitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 689 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 670 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 106 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 101 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 8% |
| Other | 130 | 19% |
| Unknown | 148 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 199 | 29% |
| Psychology | 171 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 61 | 9% |
| Unknown | 176 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,927,692
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,104
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,916
of 85,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#11
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.