| Title |
Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-004-6066-x |
| Authors |
Kevin J. Gaston, Richard M. Smith, Ken Thompson, Philip H. Warren |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 611 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 2% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 1% |
| Unknown | 563 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 117 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 111 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 105 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 279 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 172 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Design | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 38 | 6% |
| Unknown | 89 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,395,335
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#674
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,903
of 161,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.