↓ Skip to main content

Window of Sensitivity for the Estrogenic Effects of Ethinylestradiol in Early Life-Stages of Fathead Minnow, Pimephales promelas

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Window of Sensitivity for the Estrogenic Effects of Ethinylestradiol in Early Life-Stages of Fathead Minnow, Pimephales promelas
Published in
Ecotoxicology, December 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1021053217513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronny van Aerle, Nadine Pounds, Tom H. Hutchinson, Sue Maddix, Charles R. Tyler

Abstract

Sexual differentiation in fish occurs after hatching during early life-stages and is believed to be a time when the gonad has a heightened sensitivity to disruption by chemicals that mimic hormones. In this study fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) were exposed to an environmentally relevant concentration of ethinylestradiol (EE2) for short intervals in fish early life-stages and vitellogenic and gonadal responses were measured at 30 and 100 dph (sexual maturity), respectively. All EE2 exposure regimes induced vitellogenin (VTG) synthesis and disruption in duct development (a feminization) in males, with a window of enhanced sensitivity between 10 and 15 dph (where 60% of the males had feminized ducts). There was an altered pattern in sex cell development in males (inhibition of spermatogenesis) in the solvent controls (ethanol 0.1 ml/l) and all EE2 treatments when compared with the dilution water controls. Furthermore, fewer spermatozoa were observed in the testis of males exposed to EE2 from 15 to 20 dph and fertilized eggs (<24 h post-fertilization)-20 dph, compared with both the solvent and dilution water controls. These data show that short exposures of embryos/very early life-stage fathead minnows to an environmentally relevant concentration of EE2 lead to alterations in gonadal development that potentially have reproductive consequences and thus population level effects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 50%
Environmental Science 16 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2008.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#304
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,214
of 135,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them