| Title |
Microscopic examination of the microstructure and deformation of conventional and auxetic foams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, November 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1018665617008 |
| Authors |
N CHAN, K. E EVANS |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 43% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 18 | 38% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 23% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#1,037
of 4,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,403
of 29,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.