↓ Skip to main content

Impulsive‐compulsive spectrum behaviors in pathologically confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Movement Disorders, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impulsive‐compulsive spectrum behaviors in pathologically confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy
Published in
Movement Disorders, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/mds.22902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean S. O'Sullivan, Atbin Djamshidian, Zeshan Ahmed, Andrew H. Evans, Andrew D. Lawrence, Janice L. Holton, Tamas Revesz, Andrew J. Lees

Abstract

There is growing awareness of impulsive-compulsive spectrum behaviors (ICBs) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with dopamine replacement therapy (DRT). These include pathological gambling, hypersexuality, compulsive shopping, binge eating, punding and compulsive use of DRT, or dopamine dysregulation syndrome. In PD, difficulties exist in separating the effects of DRT from the underlying disease process and aberrant dopaminergic systems in determining the aetiology of ICBs. Recent reports of ICBs associated with dopamine agonist use for conditions other than PD may suggest a significant etiological role for these medications, but currently published cases thus far lack pathological confirmation of diagnoses. We present three cases of pathologically confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy who developed ICBs in association with dopamine agonist use. Pathological comparisons between these three cases and other case series of progressive supranuclear palsy are made.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Unspecified 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2010.
All research outputs
#16,744,582
of 24,627,841 outputs
Outputs from Movement Disorders
#3,972
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,848
of 99,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Disorders
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,627,841 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.