↓ Skip to main content

アトピー性皮膚炎における塩水療法

Overview of attention for article published in The Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 105)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アトピー性皮膚炎における塩水療法
Published in
The Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology, January 1995
DOI 10.2336/nishinihonhifu.57.84
Authors

向井 秀樹, 新井 達, 浅井 寿子, 武村 俊之, 加藤 一郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,396,550
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from The Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology
#1
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#791
of 76,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them