↓ Skip to main content

Comments on controversial tick (Acari: Ixodida) species names and species described or resurrected from 2003 to 2008

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental and Applied Acarology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Comments on controversial tick (Acari: Ixodida) species names and species described or resurrected from 2003 to 2008
Published in
Experimental and Applied Acarology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10493-009-9246-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto A. Guglielmone, Richard G. Robbins, Dmitry A. Apanaskevich, Trevor N. Petney, Agustín Estrada-Peña, Ivan G. Horak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 28%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 47%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 14 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Experimental and Applied Acarology
#170
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,193
of 175,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental and Applied Acarology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.