| Title |
The Therapeutic Survival Benefit of Splenic Hilar Nodal Dissection for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Invading the Greater Curvature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-018-07122-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masahiro Yura, Takaki Yoshikawa, Sho Otsuki, Yukinori Yamagata, Shinji Morita, Hitoshi Katai, Toshirou Nishida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Brazil | 2 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Romania | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 44% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,357,616
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#581
of 6,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,074
of 435,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#14
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.