| Title |
Metatranscriptomic and comparative genomic insights into resuscitation mechanisms during enrichment culturing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-018-0613-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Da-Shuai Mu, Qi-Yun Liang, Xiao-Man Wang, De-Chen Lu, Ming-Jing Shi, Guan-Jun Chen, Zong-Jun Du |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| Colombia | 2 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 39% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,142,124
of 24,038,559 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#857
of 1,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,065
of 444,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#26
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,038,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.