You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SMAD4 Loss in Colorectal Cancer Patients Correlates with Recurrence, Loss of Immune Infiltrate, and Chemoresistance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1726 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isaac Wasserman, Lik Hang Lee, Shuji Ogino, Michael R. Marco, Chao Wu, Xi Chen, Jashodeep Datta, Eran Sadot, Bryan Szeglin, Jose G. Guillem, Philip B. Paty, Martin R. Weiser, Garrett M. Nash, Leonard Saltz, Afsar Barlas, Katia Manova-Todorova, Srijaya Prakash Babu Uppada, Arthur E. Elghouayel, Peter Ntiamoah, Jonathan N. Glickman, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Keisuke Kosumi, Kentaro Inamura, Andrew T. Chan, Reiko Nishihara, Andrea Cercek, Karuna Ganesh, Nancy E. Kemeny, Punita Dhawan, Rona Yaeger, Charles L. Sawyers, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Marios Giannakis, Jinru Shia, J. Joshua Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 62% |
| Portugal | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,876,081
of 23,966,197 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#3,597
of 12,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,058
of 355,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#77
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,966,197 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.