↓ Skip to main content

Mad, Bad or Heroic? Gender, Identity and Accountability in Lay Portrayals of Suicide in Late Twentieth-Century England

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Mad, Bad or Heroic? Gender, Identity and Accountability in Lay Portrayals of Suicide in Late Twentieth-Century England
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11013-012-9259-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christabel Owens, Helen Lambert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 26%
Social Sciences 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,012,530
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#322
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,511
of 163,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.