↓ Skip to main content

Rescue treatment for noninvasive ventilation failure due to interface intolerance with remifentanil analgosedation: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Rescue treatment for noninvasive ventilation failure due to interface intolerance with remifentanil analgosedation: a pilot study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00134-010-2026-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Rocco, Giorgio Conti, Elisa Alessandri, Andrea Morelli, Gustavo Spadetta, Amalia Laderchi, Carmela Di Santo, Samanta Francavilla, Paolo Pietropaoli

Abstract

To assess the feasibility of remifentanil-based sedation in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (HARF) patients refusing to continue noninvasive ventilation (NPPV) for intolerance to two different interfaces-helmet and total face mask.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
France 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 18%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor 7 9%
Other 21 26%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,615
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,288
of 96,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.