↓ Skip to main content

18F-FDG and 11C-choline uptake in proliferating tumor cells is dependent on the cell cycle in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Nuclear Medicine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
18F-FDG and 11C-choline uptake in proliferating tumor cells is dependent on the cell cycle in vitro
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12149-018-01325-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Motoi Roppongi, Mitsuru Izumisawa, Kazunori Terasaki, Yasushi Muraki, Masanori Shozushima

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Lecturer 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,555,964
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#314
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,602
of 437,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them