| Title |
Involving young people in BRIGHTLIGHT from study inception to secondary data analysis: insights from 10 years of user involvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-018-0135-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel M. Taylor, Jeremy S. Whelan, Faith Gibson, Sue Morgan, Lorna A. Fern |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 45% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 65% |
| Scientists | 9 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
| Psychology | 8 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,573,427
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#126
of 520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,369
of 448,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.