| Title |
A comparison of information sharing behaviours across 379 health conditions on Twitter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-018-1192-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ziqi Zhang, Wasim Ahmed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 17% |
| United States | 11 | 15% |
| Spain | 5 | 7% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 69% |
| Scientists | 11 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#720,571
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#56
of 1,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,101
of 447,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.