↓ Skip to main content

Probing the Virtual Proteome to Identify Novel Disease Biomarkers

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
22 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probing the Virtual Proteome to Identify Novel Disease Biomarkers
Published in
Circulation, November 2018
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.118.036063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan D Mosley, Mark D Benson, J Gustav Smith, Olle Melander, Debby Ngo, Christian M Shaffer, Jane F Ferguson, Matthew S Herzig, Catherine A McCarty, Christopher G Chute, Gail P Jarvik, Adam S Gordon, Melody R Palmer, David R Crosslin, Eric B Larson, David S Carrell, Iftikhar J Kullo, Jennifer A Pacheco, Peggy L Peissig, Murray H Brilliant, Terrie E Kitchner, James G Linneman, Bahram Namjou, Marc S Williams, Marylyn D Ritchie, Kenneth M Borthwick, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Frank D Mentch, Patrick M Sleiman, Elizabeth W Karlson, Shefali S Verma, Yineng Zhu, Ramachandran S Vasan, Qiong Yang, Josh C Denny, Dan M Roden, Robert E Gerszten, Thomas J Wang

Abstract

Proteomic approaches allow measurement of thousands of proteins in a single specimen, which can accelerate biomarker discovery. However, applying these technologies to massive biobanks is not currently feasible because of the practical barriers and costs of implementing such assays at scale. To overcome these challenges, we used a "virtual proteomic" approach, linking genetically predicted protein levels to clinical diagnoses in >40 000 individuals. We used genome-wide association data from the Framingham Heart Study (n=759) to construct genetic predictors for 1129 plasma protein levels. We validated the genetic predictors for 268 proteins and used them to compute predicted protein levels in 41 288 genotyped individuals in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) cohort. We tested associations for each predicted protein with 1128 clinical phenotypes. Lead associations were validated with directly measured protein levels and either low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or subclinical atherosclerosis in the MDCS (Malmö Diet and Cancer Study; n=651). In the virtual proteomic analysis in eMERGE, 55 proteins were associated with 89 distinct diagnoses at a false discovery rate q<0.1. Among these, 13 associations involved lipid (n=7) or atherosclerosis (n=6) phenotypes. We tested each association for validation in MDCS using directly measured protein levels. At Bonferroni-adjusted significance thresholds, levels of apolipoprotein E isoforms were associated with hyperlipidemia, and circulating C-type lectin domain family 1 member B and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β predicted subclinical atherosclerosis. Odds ratios for carotid atherosclerosis were 1.31 (95% CI, 1.08-1.58; P=0.006) per 1-SD increment in C-type lectin domain family 1 member B and 0.79 (0.66-0.94; P=0.008) per 1-SD increment in platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β. We demonstrate a biomarker discovery paradigm to identify candidate biomarkers of cardiovascular and other diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 31 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,700,511
of 24,506,807 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#3,870
of 20,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,847
of 446,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#95
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,506,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.