↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Matrix Models for Characterizing Invasions

Overview of attention for article published in Biometrics, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Matrix Models for Characterizing Invasions
Published in
Biometrics, January 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00725.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mevin B. Hooten, Christopher K. Wikle, Robert M. Dorazio, J. Andrew Royle

Abstract

The growth and dispersal of biotic organisms is an important subject in ecology. Ecologists are able to accurately describe survival and fecundity in plant and animal populations and have developed quantitative approaches to study the dynamics of dispersal and population size. Of particular interest are the dynamics of invasive species. Such nonindigenous animals and plants can levy significant impacts on native biotic communities. Effective models for relative abundance have been developed; however, a better understanding of the dynamics of actual population size (as opposed to relative abundance) in an invasion would be beneficial to all branches of ecology. In this article, we adopt a hierarchical Bayesian framework for modeling the invasion of such species while addressing the discrete nature of the data and uncertainty associated with the probability of detection. The nonlinear dynamics between discrete time points are intuitively modeled through an embedded deterministic population model with density-dependent growth and dispersal components. Additionally, we illustrate the importance of accommodating spatially varying dispersal rates. The method is applied to the specific case of the Eurasian Collared-Dove, an invasive species at mid-invasion in the United States at the time of this writing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 6%
New Zealand 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 155 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 26%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Master 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 55%
Environmental Science 41 23%
Mathematics 10 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Philosophy 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 17 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,524,532
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Biometrics
#1,220
of 1,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,505
of 171,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biometrics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,931 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.