You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TLR4 polymorphisms, infectious diseases, and evolutionary pressure during migration of modern humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0704828104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bart Ferwerda, Matthew B. B. McCall, Santos Alonso, Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Maria Mouktaroudi, Neskuts Izagirre, Din Syafruddin, Gibson Kibiki, Tudor Cristea, Anneke Hijmans, Lutz Hamann, Shoshana Israel, Gehad ElGhazali, Marita Troye-Blomberg, Oliver Kumpf, Boubacar Maiga, Amagana Dolo, Ogobara Doumbo, Cornelus C. Hermsen, Anton F. H. Stalenhoef, Reinout van Crevel, Han G. Brunner, Djin-Ye Oh, Ralf R. Schumann, Concepcion de la Rúa, Robert Sauerwein, Bart-Jan Kullberg, André J. A. M. van der Ven, Jos W. M. van der Meer, Mihai G. Netea |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 12% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 100 | 89% |
| Scientists | 8 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 19% |
| Researcher | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Professor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#657,051
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#11,091
of 103,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,016
of 85,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#30
of 571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.