| Title |
The plasma peptides of ovarian cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12014-018-9215-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaimie Dufresne, Pete Bowden, Thanusi Thavarajah, Angelique Florentinus-Mefailoski, Zhuo Zhen Chen, Monika Tucholska, Tenzin Norzin, Margaret Truc Ho, Morla Phan, Nargiz Mohamed, Amir Ravandi, Eric Stanton, Arthur S. Slutsky, Claudia C. dos Santos, Alexander Romaschin, John C. Marshall, Christina Addison, Shawn Malone, Daren Heyland, Philip Scheltens, Joep Killestein, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Eleftherios P. Diamandis, K. W. Michael Siu, John G. Marshall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,738,515
of 23,770,218 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#61
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,226
of 439,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,770,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them