Title |
Complementary/alternative medicine for hypertension: a mini-review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, September 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10354-005-0205-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Edzard Ernst |
Abstract |
Many hypertensive patients try complementary/alternative medicine for blood pressure control. Based on extensive electronic literature searches, the evidence from clinical trials is summarised. Numerous herbal remedies, non-herbal remedies and other approaches have been tested and some seem to have antihypertensive effects. The effect size is usually modest, and independent replications are frequently missing. The most encouraging data pertain to garlic, autogenic training, biofeedback and yoga. More research is required before firm recommendations can be offered. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 18% |
Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
Psychology | 7 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 13% |
Unknown | 41 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,909,639
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#45
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,484
of 59,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them