| Title |
Practical guidance on the use of sacubitril/valsartan for heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heart Failure Reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10741-018-9757-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J. Sauer, Robert Cole, Brian C. Jensen, Jay Pal, Nakul Sharma, Amin Yehya, Justin Vader |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 13 | 14% |
| Spain | 11 | 12% |
| United States | 6 | 6% |
| Colombia | 6 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 6% |
| Argentina | 5 | 5% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 74 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 43% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 80 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#668,869
of 25,302,890 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#17
of 749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,035
of 448,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,302,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.