You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Variants in ARL15 that Influence Adiponectin Levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000768 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Brent Richards, Dawn Waterworth, Stephen O'Rahilly, Marie-France Hivert, Ruth J. F. Loos, John R. B. Perry, Toshiko Tanaka, Nicholas John Timpson, Robert K. Semple, Nicole Soranzo, Kijoung Song, Nuno Rocha, Elin Grundberg, Josée Dupuis, Jose C. Florez, Claudia Langenberg, Inga Prokopenko, Richa Saxena, Robert Sladek, Yurii Aulchenko, David Evans, Gerard Waeber, Jeanette Erdmann, Mary-Susan Burnett, Naveed Sattar, Joseph Devaney, Christina Willenborg, Aroon Hingorani, Jaquelin C. M. Witteman, Peter Vollenweider, Beate Glaser, Christian Hengstenberg, Luigi Ferrucci, David Melzer, Klaus Stark, John Deanfield, Janina Winogradow, Martina Grassl, Alistair S. Hall, Josephine M. Egan, John R. Thompson, Sally L. Ricketts, Inke R. König, Wibke Reinhard, Scott Grundy, H-Erich Wichmann, Phil Barter, Robert Mahley, Y. Antero Kesaniemi, Daniel J. Rader, Muredach P. Reilly, Stephen E. Epstein, Alexandre F. R. Stewart, Cornelia M. Van Duijn, Heribert Schunkert, Keith Burling, Panos Deloukas, Tomi Pastinen, Nilesh J. Samani, Ruth McPherson, George Davey Smith, Timothy M. Frayling, Nicholas J. Wareham, James B. Meigs, Vincent Mooser, Tim D. Spector |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,550,571
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#5,431
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,436
of 176,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#31
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.