↓ Skip to main content

Association of Adiposity Genetic Variants With Menarche Timing in 92,105 Women of European Descent

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of Adiposity Genetic Variants With Menarche Timing in 92,105 Women of European Descent
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, April 2013
DOI 10.1093/aje/kws473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes, Ellen W Demerath, Diana L Cousminer, Ran Tao, Jill G Dreyfus, Tõnu Esko, Albert V Smith, Vilmundur Gudnason, Tamara B Harris, Lenore Launer, Patrick F McArdle, Laura M Yerges-Armstrong, Cathy E Elks, David P Strachan, Zoltán Kutalik, Peter Vollenweider, Bjarke Feenstra, Heather A Boyd, Andres Metspalu, Evelin Mihailov, Linda Broer, M Carola Zillikens, Ben Oostra, Cornelia M van Duijn, Kathryn L Lunetta, John R B Perry, Anna Murray, Daniel L Koller, Dongbing Lai, Tanguy Corre, Daniela Toniolo, Eva Albrecht, Doris Stöckl, Harald Grallert, Christian Gieger, Caroline Hayward, Ozren Polasek, Igor Rudan, James F Wilson, Chunyan He, Peter Kraft, Frank B Hu, David J Hunter, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Gonneke Willemsen, Dorret I Boomsma, Enda M Byrne, Nicholas G Martin, Grant W Montgomery, Nicole M Warrington, Craig E Pennell, Lisette Stolk, Jenny A Visser, Albert Hofman, André G Uitterlinden, Fernando Rivadeneira, Peng Lin, Sherri L Fisher, Laura J Bierut, Laura Crisponi, Eleonora Porcu, Massimo Mangino, Guangju Zhai, Tim D Spector, Julie E Buring, Lynda M Rose, Paul M Ridker, Charles Poole, Joel N Hirschhorn, Joanne M Murabito, Daniel I Chasman, Elisabeth Widen, Kari E North, Ken K Ong, Nora Franceschini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2011.
All research outputs
#5,611,509
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#4,029
of 9,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,868
of 199,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#46
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.