| Title |
The phylum Vertebrata: a case for zoological recognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zoological Letters, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40851-018-0114-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naoki Irie, Noriyuki Satoh, Shigeru Kuratani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 30% |
| Morocco | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#904,282
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Zoological Letters
#12
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,340
of 447,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoological Letters
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them