↓ Skip to main content

The Proper Place of Men and Machines in Language Translation

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Translation, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 140)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
The Proper Place of Men and Machines in Language Translation
Published in
Machine Translation, March 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1007911416676
Authors

Martin Kay

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Norway 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 112 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 14 11%
Professor 11 8%
Unspecified 7 5%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 45 34%
Computer Science 37 28%
Arts and Humanities 16 12%
Unspecified 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 16 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Machine Translation
#43
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,457
of 29,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Translation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them