Title |
The dominant nutrient foramen at the clavicular midshaft: an anatomical study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00276-018-2169-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tim Leschinger, Felix Krane, Michael Hackl, Alexander van Tongel, Martin Scaal, Lars Peter Müller, Kilian Wegmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 71% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2018.
All research outputs
#16,252,483
of 23,947,846 outputs
Outputs from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#357
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,419
of 441,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,947,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.