↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of HIV Risk Perception in East Zimbabwe 2003–2013

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Accuracy of HIV Risk Perception in East Zimbabwe 2003–2013
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10461-018-2374-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin Schaefer, Ranjeeta Thomas, Constance Nyamukapa, Rufurwokuda Maswera, Noah Kadzura, Simon Gregson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 31 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Psychology 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 32 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#3,007
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,396
of 439,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#57
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.