Title |
Surface only modification of bacterial cellulose nanofibres with organic acids
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cellulose, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10570-011-9525-z |
Authors |
Koon-Yang Lee, Franck Quero, Jonny J. Blaker, Callum A. S. Hill, Stephen J. Eichhorn, Alexander Bismarck |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Serbia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 240 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 24% |
Researcher | 33 | 14% |
Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 14% |
Unknown | 47 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 52 | 21% |
Chemistry | 43 | 18% |
Engineering | 25 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
Other | 32 | 13% |
Unknown | 70 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#247
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,598
of 108,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.