| Title |
Urban Domestic Gardens (IV): The Extent of the Resource and its Associated Features
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-004-9513-9 |
| Authors |
Kevin J. Gaston, Philip H. Warren, Ken Thompson, Richard M. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 514 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 103 | 19% |
| Researcher | 90 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 85 | 15% |
| Unknown | 74 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 212 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 149 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 9% |
| Unknown | 95 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,752,095
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#736
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,369
of 164,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.