↓ Skip to main content

Conservation planning for connectivity across marine, freshwater, and terrestrial realms

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
718 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservation planning for connectivity across marine, freshwater, and terrestrial realms
Published in
Biological Conservation, March 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.006
Authors

Maria Beger, Hedley S. Grantham, Robert L. Pressey, Kerrie A. Wilson, Eric L. Peterson, Daniel Dorfman, Peter J. Mumby, Reinaldo Lourival, Daniel R. Brumbaugh, Hugh P. Possingham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 718 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Australia 6 <1%
Brazil 6 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
South Africa 5 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 4 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Other 16 2%
Unknown 659 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 181 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 18%
Student > Master 127 18%
Student > Bachelor 55 8%
Other 34 5%
Other 100 14%
Unknown 89 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 279 39%
Environmental Science 253 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 1%
Engineering 9 1%
Other 37 5%
Unknown 112 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,712,783
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,554
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,947
of 102,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#18
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.