| Title |
Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-018-0499-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva S. Peper, Gustav J. Strijkers, Katja Gazzola, Wouter V. Potters, Abdallah G. Motaal, Ilse K. Luirink, Barbara A. Hutten, Albert Wiegman, Pim van Ooij, Bert-Jan H. van den Born, Aart J. Nederveen, Bram F. Coolen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Egypt | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 22% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,615,011
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#705
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,218
of 446,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#25
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.