↓ Skip to main content

Cluster randomized evaluation of the Nia Project: study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Cluster randomized evaluation of the Nia Project: study protocol
Published in
Reproductive Health, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12978-018-0586-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eunice Muthengi, Karen Austrian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 85 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Psychology 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 91 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,667,045
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#384
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,913
of 437,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.