| Title |
Full steam ahead: direct steam exposure to inhibit spread of invasive aquatic macrophytes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-018-1901-2 |
| Authors |
Kate Crane, Ross N. Cuthbert, Jaimie T. A. Dick, Louise Kregting, Hugh J. MacIsaac, Neil E. Coughlan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 12 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 26% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,350,864
of 24,385,762 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#649
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,155
of 445,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#14
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,385,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.