You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
General contextual effects on neglected tropical disease risk in rural Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William A. de Glanville, Lian F. Thomas, Elizabeth A. J. Cook, Barend M. de C. Bronsvoort, Nicola Wardrop, Claire N. Wamae, Samuel Kariuki, Eric M. Fèvre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 6 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| South Africa | 2 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 26% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,580,401
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#1,005
of 9,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,597
of 443,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#24
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.