| Title |
Small-scale field evaluation of the efficacy and residual effect of Fludora® Fusion (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) against susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae populations from Benin, West Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-018-2633-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiacre R. Agossa, Gil G. Padonou, Arsene Jacques Y. H. Fassinou, Esdras M. Odjo, Osei K. Akuoko, Albert Salako, Zinsou C. Koukpo, Udoka C. Nwangwu, Bruno Akinro, Michel Sezonlin, Martin C. Akogbeto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,323,762
of 25,048,615 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,414
of 5,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,627
of 448,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#44
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,048,615 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.