↓ Skip to main content

Genetic evidence for the “good genes” process of sexual selection

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Genetic evidence for the “good genes” process of sexual selection
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, October 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf00170703
Authors

A. J. Moore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Professor 4 6%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 82%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,389
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,746
of 22,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.