| Title |
Auxetic behavior from rotating triangles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-006-6339-8 |
| Authors |
Joseph N. Grima, Kenneth E. Evans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 78 | 40% |
| Materials Science | 26 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 74 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,270,802
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#93
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,346
of 69,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#3
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.