↓ Skip to main content

Microstructural modelling of auxetic microporous polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Microstructural modelling of auxetic microporous polymers
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf00349875
Authors

A. Alderson, K. E. Evans

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Researcher 7 11%
Professor 2 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 29 45%
Materials Science 11 17%
Chemistry 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2005.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#934
of 4,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,677
of 60,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#35
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.