↓ Skip to main content

Audience effects on food caching in grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis): evidence for pilferage avoidance strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Audience effects on food caching in grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis): evidence for pilferage avoidance strategies
Published in
Animal Cognition, June 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0026-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa A. Leaver, Lucy Hopewell, Christine Caldwell, Lesley Mallarky

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 125 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 11 8%
Professor 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 44%
Psychology 25 19%
Environmental Science 11 8%
Philosophy 2 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,356,841
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,224
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,691
of 64,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.