↓ Skip to main content

4000 YEARS OF PHENOTYPIC CHANGE IN AN ISLAND BIRD: HETEROGENEITY OF SELECTION OVER THREE MICROEVOLUTIONARY TIMESCALES

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
4000 YEARS OF PHENOTYPIC CHANGE IN AN ISLAND BIRD: HETEROGENEITY OF SELECTION OVER THREE MICROEVOLUTIONARY TIMESCALES
Published in
Evolution, June 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00437.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonya M. Clegg, Francesca D. Frentiu, Jiro Kikkawa, Giacomo Tavecchia, Ian P. F. Owens

Abstract

Pronounced phenotypic shifts in island populations are typically attributed to natural selection, but reconstructing heterogeneity in long-term selective regimes remains a challenge. We examined a scenario of divergence proposed for species colonizing a new environment, involving directional selection with a rapid shift to a new optimum and subsequent stabilization. We provide some of the first empirical evidence for this model of evolution using morphological data from three timescales in an island bird, Zosterops lateralis chlorocephalus. In less than four millennia since separation from its mainland counterpart, a substantial increase in body size has occurred and was probably achieved in fewer than 500 generations after colonization. Over four recent decades, morphological traits have fluctuated in size but showed no significant directional trends, suggesting maintenance of a relatively stable phenotype. Finally, estimates of contemporary selection gradients indicated generally weak directional selection. These results provide a rare description of heterogeneity in long-term natural regimes, and caution that observations of current selection may be of limited value in inferring mechanisms of past adaptation due to a lack of constancy even over short time-frames.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 133 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 25%
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 8 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 70%
Environmental Science 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 12 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#2,346
of 5,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,570
of 97,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.