↓ Skip to main content

Sex-biased movement in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Sex-biased movement in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)
Published in
Oecologia, July 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00442-003-1268-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren P. Croft, Brett Albanese, Bethany J. Arrowsmith, Marc Botham, Michael Webster, Jens Krause

Abstract

The movement strategies of birds and mammals are often closely linked to their mating system, but few studies have examined the relationship between mating systems and movement in fishes. We examined the movement patterns of the guppy ( Poecilia reticulata) in the Arima river of Trinidad and predicted that sexual asymmetry in reproductive investment would result in male-biased movement. Since male guppies maximize their reproductive success by mating with as many different females as possible, there should be strong selection for males to move in search of mates. In agreement with our prediction, the percentage of fish that emigrated from release pools was higher for males than females (27.3% vs. 6.9%, respectively). Sex ratio was highly variable among pools and may influence a male's decision to emigrate or continue moving. We also detected a positive relationship between body length and the probability of emigration for males and a significant bias for upstream movement by males. Among the few females that did emigrate, a positive correlation was observed between body length and distance moved. Sex-biased movement appears to be related to mating systems in fishes, but the evidence is very limited. Given the implications for ecology, evolution, and conservation, future studies should explicitly address the influence of sex and mating systems on movement patterns.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 193 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 21%
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Master 24 11%
Professor 11 5%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 43 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 58%
Environmental Science 23 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Unspecified 2 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 49 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#925
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,468
of 52,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.