↓ Skip to main content

Testate amoebae analysis in ecological and paleoecological studies of wetlands: past, present and future

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Testate amoebae analysis in ecological and paleoecological studies of wetlands: past, present and future
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10531-007-9221-3
Authors

Edward A. D. Mitchell, Daniel J. Charman, Barry G. Warner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 214 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 47 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 62 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 53 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,289
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,308
of 92,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.