| Title |
Pedestrian smartphone overuse and inattentional blindness: an observational study in Taipei, Taiwan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6163-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ping-Ling Chen, Chih-Wei Pai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,055,501
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,504
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,351
of 441,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#91
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.