↓ Skip to main content

An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
108 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
553 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice
Published in
Nature Genetics, December 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41588-018-0302-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A. Morris, John P. Kemp, Scott E. Youlten, Laetitia Laurent, John G. Logan, Ryan C. Chai, Nicholas A. Vulpescu, Vincenzo Forgetta, Aaron Kleinman, Sindhu T. Mohanty, C. Marcelo Sergio, Julian Quinn, Loan Nguyen-Yamamoto, Aimee-Lee Luco, Jinchu Vijay, Marie-Michelle Simon, Albena Pramatarova, Carolina Medina-Gomez, Katerina Trajanoska, Elena J. Ghirardello, Natalie C. Butterfield, Katharine F. Curry, Victoria D. Leitch, Penny C. Sparkes, Anne-Tounsia Adoum, Naila S. Mannan, Davide S. K. Komla-Ebri, Andrea S. Pollard, Hannah F. Dewhurst, Thomas A. D. Hassall, Michael-John G. Beltejar, Douglas J. Adams, Suzanne M. Vaillancourt, Stephen Kaptoge, Paul Baldock, Cyrus Cooper, Jonathan Reeve, Evangelia E. Ntzani, Evangelos Evangelou, Claes Ohlsson, David Karasik, Fernando Rivadeneira, Douglas P. Kiel, Jonathan H. Tobias, Celia L. Gregson, Nicholas C. Harvey, Elin Grundberg, David Goltzman, David J. Adams, Christopher J. Lelliott, David A. Hinds, Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Matthew T. Maurano, Peter I. Croucher, Graham R. Williams, J. H. Duncan Bassett, David M. Evans, J. Brent Richards

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 309 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 20%
Researcher 52 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Master 22 7%
Other 16 5%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 80 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 83 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 98 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#240,923
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#407
of 7,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,159
of 446,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#12
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.