↓ Skip to main content

Spandrels and a pervasive problem of evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Spandrels and a pervasive problem of evidence
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10539-008-9144-8
Authors

Patrick Forber

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 11 14%
Other 8 11%
Professor 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 36%
Philosophy 13 17%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Psychology 5 7%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 7 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,581,674
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#324
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,057
of 166,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.