| Title |
Anaesthetic management for endobronchial valve insertion: lessons learned from a single centre retrospective series and a literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-018-0670-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan, Thomas Maycock, Dion Grosser, John Currie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,523,558
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#249
of 1,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,726
of 437,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.