↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the eukaryotic prenylome by isoprenoid affinity tagging

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemical Biology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of the eukaryotic prenylome by isoprenoid affinity tagging
Published in
Nature Chemical Biology, February 2009
DOI 10.1038/nchembio.149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uyen T T Nguyen, Zhong Guo, Christine Delon, Yaowen Wu, Celine Deraeve, Benjamin Fränzel, Robin S Bon, Wulf Blankenfeldt, Roger S Goody, Herbert Waldmann, Dirk Wolters, Kirill Alexandrov

Abstract

Protein prenylation is a widespread phenomenon in eukaryotic cells that affects many important signaling molecules. We describe the structure-guided design of engineered protein prenyltransferases and their universal synthetic substrate, biotin-geranylpyrophosphate. These new tools allowed us to detect femtomolar amounts of prenylatable proteins in cells and organs and to identify their cognate protein prenyltransferases. Using this approach, we analyzed the in vivo effects of protein prenyltransferase inhibitors. Whereas some of the inhibitors displayed the expected activities, others lacked in vivo activity or targeted a broader spectrum of prenyltransferases than previously believed. To quantitate the in vivo effect of the prenylation inhibitors, we profiled biotin-geranyl-tagged RabGTPases across the proteome by mass spectrometry. We also demonstrate that sites of active vesicular transport carry most of the RabGTPases. This approach enables a quantitative proteome-wide analysis of the regulation of protein prenylation and its modulation by therapeutic agents.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Researcher 23 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Professor 9 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 19%
Chemistry 22 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemical Biology
#2,133
of 3,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,830
of 185,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemical Biology
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.