↓ Skip to main content

Inertial Microfluidics-Based Cell Sorting

Overview of attention for article published in BioChip Journal, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Inertial Microfluidics-Based Cell Sorting
Published in
BioChip Journal, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13206-018-2401-2
Authors

Ga-Yeong Kim, Jong-In Han, Je-Kyun Park

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 22%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 35 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 38 37%
Chemical Engineering 5 5%
Chemistry 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 44 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,661,637
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from BioChip Journal
#72
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,773
of 436,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioChip Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them