| Title |
Comparing inferences derived from microsatellite and RADseq datasets: a case study involving threatened bull trout
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-018-1134-z |
| Authors |
Justin Bohling, Maureen Small, Jennifer Von Bargen, Amelia Louden, Patrick DeHaan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,029,014
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#834
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,864
of 438,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.