| Title |
A new genomovar of Pseudomonas cichorii, a causal agent of tomato pith necrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-013-0258-8 |
| Authors |
Emmanouil A. Trantas, Panagiotis F. Sarris, Evaggelia E. Mpalantinaki, Marianna G. Pentari, Filippos N. Ververidis, Dimitrios E. Goumas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#317
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,668
of 198,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.